BlockNews
FOLLOW ON X
  • BITCOIN
  • CRYPTO
    • ETHEREUM
    • RIPPLE XRP
    • SOLANA
    • CARDANO
    • BINANCE BNB
    • DOGECOIN
    • TRON
    • SUI
    • CHAINLINK
    • LITECOIN
  • FINANCE
  • POLITICS
  • MEMECOINS
  • NFT
  • OPINION
No Result
View All Result
BlockNews
  • BITCOIN
  • CRYPTO
    • ETHEREUM
    • RIPPLE XRP
    • SOLANA
    • CARDANO
    • BINANCE BNB
    • DOGECOIN
    • TRON
    • SUI
    • CHAINLINK
    • LITECOIN
  • FINANCE
  • POLITICS
  • MEMECOINS
  • NFT
  • OPINION
No Result
View All Result
BlockNews
Home CRYPTO BITCOIN

Bithumb’s 620,000 BTC Glitch Exposes Crypto Oversight Gaps – Here Is the Fallout

Gary Ponce by Gary Ponce
February 22, 2026
in BITCOIN, CRYPTO, FINANCE, OPINION
Share on XShare in TelegramShare on Reddit
  • Bithumb mistakenly credited users with 2,000 BTC each during a promotion, creating a false record of 620,000 BTC distributed.
  • South Korean regulators face criticism after multiple inspections failed to detect discrepancies in the exchange’s internal controls.
  • Authorities have expanded investigations into Bithumb and other major exchanges, while a separate lost Bitcoin seizure case was recently resolved.

South Korea’s financial watchdogs are taking heat after a stunning systems failure at Bithumb exposed serious internal weaknesses. Despite multiple inspections by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), a critical vulnerability slipped through. That gap allowed a single employee to trigger massive Bitcoin transfers without immediate detection. Not exactly a small oversight.

Rep. Kang Min-guk revealed that the FSC reviewed Bithumb once in 2022 and twice again in 2025, while the FSS conducted three separate inspections over that stretch. Yet none of those reviews flagged discrepancies between actual Bitcoin reserves and the exchange’s accounting records. On paper, everything looked fine. In reality, it clearly wasn’t.

Btc

620,000 Bitcoin Error Sparks Political Backlash

The issue came to light on February 6 during what was supposed to be a routine promotional event. Instead of crediting users with coins worth 2,000 won, roughly $1.38, the system mistakenly credited each eligible user with 2,000 BTC. Yes, 2,000 whole bitcoins per user. The internal ledger ended up reflecting an eye-watering 620,000 BTC “distributed,” even though Bithumb reportedly holds only around 42,800 BTC.

Lawmakers were quick to react. Rep. Han Chang-min questioned whether regulatory inspections had become little more than box-ticking exercises. Others argued the incident revealed deeper flaws in internal controls, ledger reconciliation, and oversight practices. The FSS has now extended its investigation through February, examining potential violations tied to investor protection, anti-money laundering compliance, and broader system weaknesses.

Bithumb CEO Lee Jae-won admitted there had been two smaller system errors in the past that were resolved internally. Those incidents are now under review as well. Meanwhile, authorities and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) have launched emergency checks at other major exchanges, including Upbit, Coinone, Korbit, and GOPAX. The findings could shape future self-regulatory standards and even influence upcoming crypto legislation in the country.

Another Bitcoin Mishap, Recovered at Last

This controversy follows another embarrassing episode just weeks earlier. The Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office disclosed that 320.8 bitcoins, worth around 40 billion won, had vanished from custody after being seized in a criminal case. The funds were originally confiscated from the daughter of operators behind an illegal overseas gambling operation that allegedly processed 390 billion won between 2018 and 2021.

The loss reportedly occurred when prosecutors accidentally accessed a phishing site while checking the wallet last August, exposing the seized assets. Surprisingly, the story didn’t end in permanent loss. On February 17, the missing bitcoins were returned to the prosecutors’ wallet, apparently voluntarily, after the hacker failed to liquidate them.

Authorities are still tracking the individual involved and coordinating with domestic and international exchanges to prevent further incidents. Taken together, these back-to-back mishaps have intensified scrutiny of South Korea’s crypto oversight framework. The systems exist. The inspections happen. But recent events suggest the safeguards, at least for now, may not be as airtight as officials once believed.

Disclaimer: BlockNews provides independent reporting on crypto, blockchain, and digital finance. All content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should do their own research before making investment decisions. Some articles may use AI tools to assist in drafting, but every piece is reviewed and edited by our editorial team of experienced crypto writers and analysts before publication.
Tags: AMLBitcoinBithumbCrypto Regulationexchange oversightSouth Korea
Tweet1ShareShare
Gary Ponce

Gary Ponce

Gary has been active in the crypto space since 2019, developing hands-on experience in trading, airdrop hunting, and identifying emerging narratives in low-cap tokens. For over four years, he has contributed research and editorial content with Aiur Labs and BlockNews, focusing on market analysis and community insights. His work reflects both transparency and independent reporting, with an emphasis on simplifying complex ideas for readers. Gary is a long-term believer in Bitcoin, Sui, Hype, Litecoin, XRP, AVAX, and select meme tokens, combining personal trading knowledge with professional editorial standards.

DON'T MISS THESE! HOT OFF THE PRESS

XRP Sees Largest Realized Loss Since 2022 – Here Is What Crypto History Suggests
CRYPTO

XRP Sees Largest Realized Loss Since 2022 – Here Is What Crypto History Suggests

February 22, 2026
ETH Mega-Holder Cost Basis Breaks – Here Is Why Downside Risks Are Growing in Crypto
CRYPTO

ETH Mega-Holder Cost Basis Breaks – Here Is Why Downside Risks Are Growing in Crypto

February 22, 2026
Hyperliquid HYPE Breaks Out as Arthur Hayes Predicts $150 – Here Is the Crypto Setup
CRYPTO

Hyperliquid HYPE Breaks Out as Arthur Hayes Predicts $150 – Here Is the Crypto Setup

February 22, 2026
XLM Shows Neutral Momentum While Institutional Adoption Grows – Here Is the Next Move
CRYPTO

XLM Shows Neutral Momentum While Institutional Adoption Grows – Here Is the Next Move

February 22, 2026
Litecoin Tests $57 Resistance as Bullish Signals Clash – Here Is the Crypto Outlook
CRYPTO

Litecoin Tests $57 Resistance as Bullish Signals Clash – Here Is the Crypto Outlook

February 22, 2026
Sui Network User Growth Surges While Price Stalls – Here Is What It Means for Crypto
CRYPTO

Sui Network User Growth Surges While Price Stalls – Here Is What It Means for Crypto

February 22, 2026
Load More

Related News

XRP Sees Largest Realized Loss Since 2022 – Here Is What Crypto History Suggests

XRP Sees Largest Realized Loss Since 2022 – Here Is What Crypto History Suggests

February 22, 2026
ETH Mega-Holder Cost Basis Breaks – Here Is Why Downside Risks Are Growing in Crypto

ETH Mega-Holder Cost Basis Breaks – Here Is Why Downside Risks Are Growing in Crypto

February 22, 2026
Bithumb’s 620,000 BTC Glitch Exposes Crypto Oversight Gaps – Here Is the Fallout

Bithumb’s 620,000 BTC Glitch Exposes Crypto Oversight Gaps – Here Is the Fallout

February 22, 2026
Hyperliquid HYPE Breaks Out as Arthur Hayes Predicts $150 – Here Is the Crypto Setup

Hyperliquid HYPE Breaks Out as Arthur Hayes Predicts $150 – Here Is the Crypto Setup

February 22, 2026
XLM Shows Neutral Momentum While Institutional Adoption Grows – Here Is the Next Move

XLM Shows Neutral Momentum While Institutional Adoption Grows – Here Is the Next Move

February 22, 2026
Twitter Telegram Threads

BLOCKNEWS.COM

BlockNews is your premier source for real-time cryptocurrency, blockchain, political and financial market news.

Stay ahead of the herd with BlockNews

RESOURCES

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

DISCLOSURES AND POLICIES

BlockNews provides independent reporting on crypto, blockchain, and digital finance. Content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Sponsored material is always disclosed. By using this site, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

© 2025 BlockNews

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • BITCOIN
  • CRYPTO
    • ETHEREUM
    • RIPPLE XRP
    • SOLANA
    • CARDANO
    • BINANCE BNB
    • DOGECOIN
    • TRON
    • LITECOIN
    • CHAINLINK
    • SUI
  • MEMECOINS
  • POLITICS
  • FINANCE
  • NFT
  • DEFI
  • GUIDES

© 2025 BlockNews