Bybit suffered the largest crypto hack ever, losing $1.4 billion in ETH and stETH.
Over $76 million in ETH futures were liquidated, as panic selling hit the market.
Hackers split the stolen funds across 39 wallets, while Arkham launched a $50,000 bounty to track them down.
The crypto world is in shock as Bybit just suffered the biggest hack in industry history, with $1.4 billion in ETH and staked ETH (stETH) siphoned from its wallets. The attack has already sent Ethereum futures traders scrambling, triggering a wave of liquidations totaling $76 million in just four hours.
JUST IN: Ethereum $ETH short positions are SURGING following the Bybit hack
A 4x disparity now exists between longs and shorts
Over $1 billion in shorts would be liquidated if price returns to where it was 5 hours ago (pre Bybit) pic.twitter.com/bYpHT49sUo
Total liquidations hit $499.23 million across the market
ETH dropped 3% to $2,727, while Bitcoin slid 1% to $98,091
Bybit co-founder and CEO Ben Zhou confirmed the hack, explaining that a routine wallet transfer was manipulated—allowing attackers to gain control of the exchange’s ETH cold wallet.
“The hacker took control of the specific ETH cold wallet we signed and transferred all ETH in the cold wallet to an unidentified address,” Zhou said, adding that Bybit remains solvent despite the loss.
Hackers Splitting Stolen ETH Across 39 Wallets
Blockchain security analyst ZachXBT was among the first to spot suspicious outflows, later confirming Bybit had been compromised.
The hackers are now splitting the stolen ETH across 39 wallets, likely in an attempt to obscure transactions and evade tracking.
Meanwhile, on-chain intelligence firm Arkham has put a bounty on the attacker’s identity, offering 50,000 ARKM tokens to anyone who provides useful intel.
“We’ve created & funded a bounty to help identify the person or organization behind today’s >$1B Bybit hack,” Arkham posted on X.
The Biggest Crypto Hacks in History—Bybit Tops the List
Bybit’s $1.4 billion exploit is now the largest crypto exchange hack ever, surpassing even some of the most infamous breaches in history:
March 2022: Axie Infinity’s Ronin Network lost $625M due to a validator exploit.
August 2022: Poly Network suffered a $611M hack, though most funds were later returned.
2014: Mt. Gox collapsed after losing 850,000 BTC, worth $460M at the time.
With crypto security threats escalating, the question remains—who’s next?
Disclaimer: BlockNews provides independent reporting on crypto, blockchain, and digital finance. All content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should do their own research before making investment decisions. Some articles may use AI tools to assist in drafting, but every piece is reviewed and edited by our editorial team of experienced crypto writers and analysts before publication.
Michael is a BSBA Management graduate from Mindanao State University and has been a professional content writer since 2019. He began exploring cryptocurrency in 2021 and has since made blockchain and digital assets his primary focus. For nearly four years, Michael has contributed research and editorial content at Aiur Labs and BlockNews, producing clear and accessible coverage of market trends, trading strategies, and project developments. He is transparent about his personal holdings in Bitcoin, TRON, and select meme tokens, combining writing expertise with hands-on market experience to deliver trustworthy insights to readers.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
