- The SEC has led a crypto crackdown which has brought much criticism to them.
- John Deaton believes the unequal treatment raises concerns about the regulatory body’s effectiveness and fairness, as well as the overall framework for digital assets.
- Much of the public as well as congressmen have criticized the SEC’s approach to regulate crypto.
Pro-XRP lawyer, John Deaton, has said that the actions taken by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the crypto industry are driven by a broader motive to safeguard corporate capitalism rather than prioritizing the protection of investors.
Deaton highlighted what he views as an assault on cryptocurrencies, particularly in relation to the SEC’s actions targeting Coinbase and Ripple. In his remarks, he touched on several aspects, such as the accredited investor rules, the SEC’s approach to regulating cryptocurrencies and its position concerning retail investors in the Ripple case.
On X (Twitter), Deaton expresses his conviction that the U.S. operates within a framework of corporate capitalism rather than a genuine capitalist system. He highlights various facets of the present financial landscape to bolster his argument.
Deaton said the SEC’s allocation of limited resources toward Section 5 cases and its focus on targeting the secondary market on exchanges instead of addressing fraud within the crypto space indicates a misplacement of priorities. He contends that this approach could potentially hinder innovation and impede the growth of the developing cryptocurrency industry.
Additionally, Deaton highlights the SEC’s opposition to retail investors participating as amici curiae (friends of the court) in the Ripple case. With this stance, Deaton suggests a reluctance to consider the views of retail investors, further solidifying the perception that the regulatory body may prioritize the interests of larger financial institutions over those of individual investors.
Deaton highlights a major concern about a perceived double standard in crypto regulation. He criticizes the SEC for not engaging in dialogue with proactive entities like Coinbase. At the same time, SEC Chair Gary Gensler had multiple meetings with Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of the collapsed FTX exchange.
The unequal treatment raises concerns about the regulatory body’s effectiveness and fairness, and the overall framework for digital assets. The SEC’s differing approach to various industry players could impede innovative startup growth while potentially favoring more established entities.
